![]() Lightroom does have a way built in to help optimize the JPEG's on export which is to reduce the quality slider from 100 down to 90 or even 80 (sticking with round even numbers.) But during my tests I found the JpegMini still had better results even when the LR quality slider was at 80. For those that use cloud services such as Dropbox this also means you are taking up significantly less space in your account. Uploading images to my gallery provider, will be even faster and when my clients request to download the full resolution files from the gallery their download will be quicker and use less space on their computer hard drive. This is great news for both me and my clients. Both photos, although one was 4x larger in file size, looked exactly the same. I opened a number of photos and examined them at full resolution size and I could not tell the difference between them. In fact using the JpegMini it saved over 9 GB of space. I was pretty amazed at the amount of space saved when using JpegMini. This time I used a full wedding and exported 1000 images. Again I exported one set with the quality slider set to 100 and another one just the same but including the JpegMini plugin during the export process. I then wondered if it was taking longer to export so I ran the test three times, timed the process and found that it only took on average 6 seconds longer when the JpegMini Lightroom plugin was being used. As you can see from the results JpegMini did a great job optimizing the files and making the folder half the size of the original. The second folder the quality slider was at 100 but I introduced the JpegMini plugin. The first folder contained images that were exported with the Lightroom quality slider set to 100. I exported them two different ways and then checked the size of each folder. My initial test started with twenty RAW photos in Lightroom. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |